And this is noticeable at first glance, I mean, look at the mistakes it makes!

Who the fuck would think of using AI to facilitate their art work?! Better grab a pen and a sheet of paper and get to work properly.

Because there are artists who take their time to make a quality work only for an AI to do the same thing in minutes and people believe it is true.

I don't think AI is the real problem. I really love what AI gives us, but only use it to give you IDEAS, don't use it to generate what you want. I mean, imagine this scenario: "You are an artist with creative block and you use an AI to give you an IDEA, then you no longer have creative block, now you have a well-defined idea, and you didn't have to resort to a bad quality image."

What I mean is that AI should only be used to provide creative ideas, not to replace artists. And this doesn't just apply to drawing, but also to writing and even sculpting, although that last one is just awful.

I've seen a lot of work WRITTEN by AI, and it's great, but it takes away that touch of creativity that REAL writers have. Plus, as I've said many times, AI makes too many mistakes.

In conclusion, AI "artists" should use their AI to give them ideas, not to replace their stupid head. That only makes them lazy people without originality who only seek acceptance in a community that they do not understand.