Actvision released Black Ops 7 hoping that it would sell well even if it is an AI-slop, riddled with issues and bugs galore with a sup-par campaign. They did this because they do not care about how bad the game is, they only care if it sells well or not.

McDonald's also has an AI issue, where they used AI to make an ad, they did that because they were hoping it wouldn't impact the sales on their products. Same thing with Coca Cola. Why did they do this? Bexause they ddin't care about their products. They care only if they sell well.

I believe the reason why so many Triple A games are releasing with so many issues is because the companies behind them do not care about how bad their products are. They will continue to push out the worst slop imaginable as long as it gets them money, even if the game is as bad as Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing.

Not only that but this also goes to movies too. FNaF 2 made well over 150,000,000$ and most people who aren't fans of FNaF don't like it, and when given criticism they said "it's for the fans". Which is honestly kind of a lame excuse, you can make a good movie and have it appeal to people who aren't fans of your franchise. But as I said, that movie made 150,000,000, so they don't care as long as they get money.

I believe I am starting to see a pattern here, where so many big video game publishers and developers alike purposefully make their games bad because they hope it will sell well because it is from a brand that is popular and iconic.

This has been something that has been on my mind for about a week and I decided it is time I share my thoughts about it.

Also, you may be asking who is in that image, it's Cobalt Taingle from FNaS MM+