Yeah I don't think I will have smth for 10 of july, sad, cause I don't wanna release this [redacted] without making [redacted] on it first, so might just do nothing, unless you got ideas guys.
As for the [redacted] itself, well it's going great, I already made the [redacted] for the [redacted] and a [redacted] to [redacted] as however you want in the [redacted], you just need to [redacted], easy, I will do a [redacted] to advance on what I want to try with the [redacted], but I'm kinda debating on how should it be.
Most of the time you would want [redacted] only, but for special cases you would want [redacted], and sometimes even the [redacted] 'cause people love those I guess, however idk if I should put them all in one [redacted] or separate them.
Like do I make one [redacted] only do [redacted], while the other uses that one to [redacted]? I guess so 'cause I want to [redacted] and [redacted] ones, so it would make sense I guess that one is also separated.
What do you guys think? End of report.
0 comments